Sunday, January 28, 2018

Sowing seeds of freedom – the story of Dundamma

One student of seed saving and home gardening at Amrita Bhoomi is Dundamma, a Dalit woman from Kariana Katte in Chamarajanagar District of Karnataka. Dundamma has grown a rich garden with more than thirty vegetables like bottle gourd, pumpkin, snake gourd, radish, many greens like is spinach, amaranth, dill, coriander, as well as roots like tapioca and potatoes. She also has many medicinal herbs and flowers. “This is my pharmacy, this is how I take care of my family’s health,” beamed Dundamma.

“We always had a small plot of land behind our house and I converted it into a kitchen garden. I grow mostly all that we need for our daily consumption, people in the cities are also doing this these days- they have roof gardens.” She exclaims.

Dundamma became weary of the toxic food being sold in the market and the constant need of money to buy food. Through her garden, she has built autonomy for herself and her family.  She says that women must be at the forefront of the food system, “In villages it is us, women who are the ones responsible for cooking and for making a kitchen garden, we have the power to bring slow change.”

Dundamma uses the waste from her kitchen, and manure from her chickens and goat as fertilizer for her garden. She also saves wastewater from her kitchen- that which is used to wash food -- to water her garden.  

Dundamma got many of her seeds from Amrita Bhoomi during a training workshop. She was so enthusiastic after her experience that she will soon join as a trainer for other women. “I have been giving out seeds to my relatives and neighbours and telling them about the benefits of growing these different plants,” she said.

“I am really happy to see my efforts are working. I am saving money, and I feel proud to feed my family food that is grown and cooked by me. So many beautiful birds have started coming to my garden everyday. It is truly joyful!” says Dundamma.

Thursday, January 25, 2018

Indian farmers write to Competition Commission of India(CCI) opposing the proposed Combination between Bayer AG and Monsanto

All Indian Coordination Committee of Farmers Movements
Road No. 2, A – 87, Mahipalpur Extension, New Delhi – 110 037, IndiaTel:+91-9899435968 ; Email: 

The Secretary,                                                                                                                          25.01.2018
Competition Commission of India,
New Delhi - 110001 

Dear Madam/Sir,
Subject: Our objection to the Proposed Combination between Bayer AG and Monsanto and request for extension of 15 days notice for public participation.

We the farmers in India as Individual Farmers,  Farmers Groups, Women Farmers, Small farmers, Young Farmers, Farm Workers, Landless Labourers have come together to place on record our objections pertaining to the Notification issued by the Competition Commission of India under Section 29(2) of the Competition Commission Act, 2002, inviting objections/ comments/ suggest with regard to the combination of Two Corporate Giants across the Globe viz,  between Bayer AG, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Allee, 51368, Leverkusen, Germany (hereinafter ‘Bayer’ or ‘Acquirer’) and Monsanto Company, 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808, County of New Castle (hereinafter ‘Monsanto’ or ‘Target’, and collectively with Bayer as ‘Parties’).

The signatories hereunder are members of All India Coordination Committee for Farmers’ Movements (ICCFM) and South Indian Coordination Committee for Farmers’ Movements (SICCFM) and we represent 12 farmers’ organizations across India representing millions of peasants, small and medium size farmers, landless people, rural women and youth, indigenous people, migrants and agricultural workers. We defend peasant agriculture for food sovereignty as a way to promote social justice and dignity and strongly oppose corporate driven agriculture that destroys social relations and nature.

We consider that the acquisition of Monsanto by Bayer not only causes but also likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within India. We request the Commission to call for the records from these two companies regarding their market concentration and study the overall reach of these two companies put together in the market and assess the percentage of their shares objectively and independent of the projections given by the Parties in Form IV, before arriving at any conclusions. The Commission should carry out this investigation to determine the questions whether the acquisition or the combination of these two giant Corporates would cause adverse effect on competition within India.

It is important to place on record the study conducted by the Friends of Earth, Europe led by Ioannis Lianos, Professor of Global Competition Law and Public Policy and Director of the Centre for Law, Economics and Society (CLES) at University College London (UCL), concludes that even on a narrow reading of EU competition law, the merger between US-based agro-chemical and biotech company Monsanto and German ‘life science’ company Bayer should not be permitted. The legal study sets out five main reasons why EU competition law requires that the merger be blocked.  The copy of the said document is enclosed herewith.

In addition to the issues raised in the said study mentioned supra and the objections submitted by many other individual farmers, farmers organization and farmers collective, we also like to highlight the certain discrepancies in the combination of Bayer and Monsanto as published in the Notification dated 5th January 2018.

In India, Bayer and Monsanto, as per the assertions given by the Parties in Form IV, prior to the closing of the Proposed Combination operate in the 5 Segments in terms of Products, viz, 1. Crop Production, 2. Agricultural Seeds, 3. Vegetable Seeds, 4. Environmental Science and 5. Traits and Technology. The Crop Productions again has 6 Sub Segments, Agricultural Seeds has 5 Sub Segments, Vegetable Seeds has 22 Sub Segments , Environment Science has 5 Sub Segments and Traits and Technology has 1 Sub Segment.

In the Crop Production Segment, both the parties have one Sub Segment overlapping i.e., Non –selective herbicides.
In Agricultural Seeds Segment, both the parties have one Sub Segment overlapping i.e. Cotton Seeds.
In Vegetable Seeds Segments, both the parties have 13 Sub segments overlapping, i.e., Cabbage, Cauliflower, Cucumber, Eggplant, Bitter Gourd, Bottle Gourd,  Melon, Okra, Onion, Hot Pepper, Sweet Pepper,  Tomato and Watermelon. 

Though the Parties claim that the Bayer has executed an agreement with BASF on 13 October 2017 to divest its global glufosinate ammonium business and, therefore, the insignificant overlap in the production and/or sale of non-selective herbicides in India does not remain.  The Commission has to look into the veracity of the said claim and verify the documents to substantiate the said claim.  The Commission shall also examine the share components of the BASF to ascertain the true nature of the Agreement said to have been executed by Bayer to BASF.  Moreover it is only in the stage of Agreement and pending finalization of the said Agreement between Bayer and BASF, the combination of the Parties should not be APPROVED by the Hon’ble Commission.

It is an admitted fact that the Monsanto indirectly holds a shareholding of 26% in Maharashtra Hybrids Seeds Company Limited (Mahyco). The fact that the Monsanto is holding 26% shares in Mahyco, which again has its presence in the various product segments in which the parties are now having market share need to be taken into consideration by the Commission as the same would have direct impact and give rise to appreciable adverse effect on competition (AAEC).  From the products Segments listed by the Parties, Mahyco has its markets share in the following Products;
Agricultural Seeds: Cotton, Rice, Millet
Vegetable Seeds: Cabbage, Cauliflower, Cucumber, Bitter Gourd, Bottle Gourd, Okra, Hot Pepper, Sweet Pepper, Water Melon.
This clearly establishes high concentration of market and a position of strength as defined under ‘Explanation’ to Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, hereinafter referred to as Act.  The dominant position in Agriculture Seeds and Vegetable Seeds Segment by the parties to the combination along with MAHYCO  would result in Abuse of Dominant Position and not only likely cause but certainly cause AAEC.

The proposal of the Monsanto to sell its branded cotton business to Tierra Agrotech Private Ltd is only with regard to downstream market.  The said sale is not yet finalized and though it is stated that it was done for reasons unrelated to the Proposed Combination, the same needs further enquiry.  The overlap between the parties said to have been eliminated in the downstream may be stage managed and needs proper enquiry and appropriate investigation.  Moreover Monsanto has 100% concentration of the market in the upstream market and Bayer has 0-5% market share in the downstream market.  All these would lead to ‘Dominant Position’ by the Parties to the Combination.  This would result in limiting or restricting  the production of goods or provisions of services or market thereof and the technical or scientific development relating to goods or services to the prejudice of consumers prohibited under Section 4 (2) (b) of the Act. This would result in AAEC and therefore the agreement should be declared as void.

Vegetable Seeds
The monopoly of the combination of the Parties in the vegetable seeds sector is highly detrimental to the market and brings down the competition and choices for the consumers.  The total monopoly in Onion and almost near monopoly in Tomato, watermelon, melon is not only detrimental to the farmers but also for the nation as such.  The Combination of the Parties engaged in identical or similar trade of goods or provisions of services, would result in determining the prices both directly and indirectly and would also result in limiting or controlling the production, supply, markets, technical development, investment or provisions of services.  This is termed as Anti Competitive agreement under Section 3 (3) of the Act.  If this combination is allowed the entire nation would have an appreciable adverse effect on competition (AAEC).  The Commission shall therefore requested to not to allow this Combination as it would have disastrous impact in the market, for the farmers as well as consumers.

The seeds treatment segment also has a monopoly of the Combination Parties both in Cotton and Corn and this would likely to cause AAEC.

We the farmers of this country see the threat the farmers community face due to the combination of the parties namely Monsanto and Bayer as it would result in Abuse of Dominant Position.  We request the Commission to conduct appropriate enquiry and investigation into the agreement between Bayer and Monsanto which will clearly establish the dominant position of this Combination in the market and thereby will bring down competition in the products, prizes, quality and participation.  This would lead to total dependency of the farmers of this county on this combination and trap the farmers in untold misery.  Given the innumerable farmers suicide across the country due to the total monopoly of Cotton market by Monsanto in the past, the Commission need to prevent this Combination and protect the farmers of this country by not falling into the trap set by this combination.


We also want the Commission to enquire that the so called sale of Monsanto’s branded cotton business to Tierra Agrotech Private Ltd and
Post the notification of this Proposed Combination with the Hon’ble Commission, Bayer has executed a definitive agreement with BASF dated 13 October 2017 to divest the following businesses:
Bayer’s worldwide glufosinate ammonium business;
Bayer’s Liberty Link technology which confers trait plants with a resistance to the non-selective herbicide glufosinate ammonium, including the related intellectual property licensing business worldwide.

Virtually the entire business of Bayer’s agricultural seeds and traits worldwide (including all of its transgenic events and traits in cotton, corn, oilseed rape, canola and soybean) is being sold to BASF. The very limited agricultural seeds and traits activities that are not part of the agreement with BASF include Bayer’s small Indian cotton seeds business.  The Commission shall investigate the true object behind these transactions, as it may be due to the legal impediments faced by this combination and to circumvent the said impediments.

Best regards,

Yudhvir Singh
General Secretary, ICCFM
Bhartiya Kisan Union, Delhi

Bhartiya Kisan Union U.P

KS Puttanaiah
Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha, Karnataka

Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha, Karnataka

Rajvir Singh
K. M. Rajegowda,
Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha, Karnataka

P Raveendranath,
Kerala Coconut Farmers Association , Kerala

S Kannaiyan
South Indian Coordination Committee of Farmers Movements

Ajmer Singh Lakhowal,
State President, BKU Punjab

K T Gangadhar

ChukkiNanjundaswamy, Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha, Karnataka

President, Tamil Nadu Farmers Association, Tamil Nadu

Uzhavar Ulaippalar Katchi,
Tamil Nadu Farmers Association

Ratan Singh Mann
BKU President , Haryana

Ms. Rajareega
President, Women Wing
Tamil Nadu Farmers Association

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

“WTO MC11 talks collapse! Celebrating the Failure of WTO Negotiation in Argentina”

La Via Campesina and its allies strongly call for END of WTO/FTA trading system

26 December 2017: As part of the ‘2017 Week of Action Against the WTO’s 11th Ministerial Conference (MC11)’ in Argentina, hundreds of delegates from across La Via Campesina’s global network of peasant movements, together with allies, had converged in Buenos Aires earlier this month, demanding an end to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and its global trade liberalisation regime.
With the outcomes of the 11th Ministerial Conference (MC11) considered a “total failure”, La Via Campesina celebrates this impasse while calling on all movements to remain vigilant at the same time. Negotiators of trade liberalisation will continue to seek out ways to attack peasant agriculture, traditional fisheries, and food sovereignty – be it through the WTO or any number of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). La Via Campesina has always maintained its firm position of rejecting the WTO rather than proposing a reformation or tweaking of the rules of this institution.
In 2003, right outside the venue of the WTO ministerial conference in Cancun, Mexico – when our comrade and Korean farmer Lee Kyung Hae stabbed himself and took his life – he was still holding a banner that read – ‘WTO Kills farmers’ . During our week of action in Buenos Aires, we recalled his words and promised that his life and that of countless other peasants who have sacrificed themselves at the altar of free trade, will not be in vain. We will continue to resist WTO and not stop until it has been totally dismantled together with neoliberalism.
The MC11’s failure has reinforced our position that the WTO is undemocratic, without legitimacy and solely promotes the interests ofbig capital at the expense of peasants, rural workers, indigenous peoples, fishers, and mother earth. The draft text on agriculture was created in a totally undemocratic manner with only a few member states and has no legitimacy.
The key issue for developing countries and farmers at this ministerial was public stockholding which underpins the food sovereignty of each state – which is a country’s sovereign right to maintain public stocks of food in order to feed its people. These stocks are often procured from small holder farmers in the country and therefore the public stockholding programs are an important lifeline for economically poorer families and peasant communities around the world. Such programs must be amplified and scaled up across the world to achieve food sovereignty. Instead, WTO’s rules see these stocks and subsidies as trade distortions.
At the WTO’s Bali Ministerial (2013) countries decided on a “Peace Clause” until a permanent solution was found.1 This peace clause was problematic as it had many conditions attached to it. Getting an unconditional and permanent solution was a key demand of the developing countries in Buenos Aires. But, the U.S. simply refused to agree to even mention ‘permanent solution’ at MC 11, thus going back on its own promises in Bali. After a heavy tussle, no permanent solution was created and there is no deadline set yet. At the moment countries will continue with the peace clause. The confrontations at MC 11 makes it evident that the developed countries do not want developing countries to implement welfare programmes, which are meant to improve the lives of economically poorer people and peasant communities.
Having taken part in multiple protests, debates and discussions at the Peoples’ Summit – as well as by carrying out direct actionsagainst the WTO and FTAs at the venue of MC11 – La Via Campesina reiterates its commitment to defeating the WTO wherever it pokes its horrific head. We warn, however, that a rise in bilateral and interregional “Free Trade” Agreements (FTAs) is as great a threat as the dying WTO. We must remain vigilant in our struggle for food sovereignty, demanding among other things more and better public policies that protect and promote peasant-led food systems based on food sovereignty principles.
In 2018 and beyond, the WTO will continue to threaten peasant agriculture and food sovereignty. We, therefore, as La Via Campesina will strongly continue the fight against the threats of WTO and FTAs and whoever demands trade liberalisation. We will fight for people’s Right to Food Sovereignty.

FOR MORE INFORMATION | | @via_campesina
1 The peace clause implied that even if a developing country gave subsidies amounting to more than 10% of production (based on the Agreement on Agriculture’s absurd formula which uses base levels of 30 years ago from 1986-88 reference price), other countries would not challenge the action at the WTO until after 2017.

Sunday, December 24, 2017

Indian farmers denounce WTO and celebrate collapse of Ministerial Conference at Argentina

Indian Farmers protest at the venue of Ministerial Conference (PC -Marcos Brindicci/Internet)

Indian farmers were in Bueonos Aires as part of larger delegation of La Via Campesina to attend  it's People Summit “WTO Out – Building Sovereignty”. The Indian farmers representatives were also accredited as civil society members to attend the World Trade Organization’s 11th Ministerial Conference. 

Yudhvir Singh and Rakesh Tikait of BKU submitting the Press release to Mr.Suresh Prabhu
Farmers and Civil Society representatives meeting with Mr.Suresh Prabhu 

Indian farmers delegation though smaller in number played major role in manning pressure on Indian government and its delegation led by Commerce and Industry Minister, Suresh Prabhu, to defend India’s food security and the livelihoods of millions of poor consumers and farmers. Indian farmers delegation conducted press briefing session followed by which they made press release warning minister to not give in to rich country demands of ending India’s public food stockholding program and farmer subsidies which they deem as trade distorting.

Powerful action by LVC members and allies inside the Ministerial Conference venue.
With representative of Indian government negotiators team and civil society friends.

Indian farmers along with hundreds of Via campesina delegates participated in multiple street actions, debates at the Peoples' Summit - including a Forum on Food Sovereignty organized by LVC and two moments of powerful direct action within the WTO Ministerial Conference.

Protest inside Ministerial Conference

Indian farmers and civil society representatives shout slogan during protest inside conference( PC -Marcos Brindicci)

Fuera OMC! Protest rally against WTO in Buenos Aires.

La Via Campesina's People Summit -“WTO Out – Building Sovereignty”

Protesters take out to streets of Buenos Aires to march against WTO

Protesters take out to streets of Buenos Aires to march against WTO

 Indian farmers call for Agriculture Out of WTO!

Down!! Down!! WTO- Korean farmers at the protest rally

The Indian farmers delegation sent clear message to the world that WTO is instrumental in killing lakhs of farmers in India and pointed out that, India is a much bigger, poorer and hungrier country and it cannot trade away the lives of farmers. For Indian farmers agriculture is not just their profession -It is their culture, their life.

Finally, The 11th World Trade Organisation (WTO) ministerial conference ended after three days of intensive negotiations without any substantial deals reached by it's 164 member states. The talks  collapsed with the US going back on the commitment made by it along with other member countries to find a permanent solution to the public food stockpile issue. US also objected to any reference to the Doha development mandate in the proposed Ministerial Declaration which was something that was not acceptable to India and many other countries. The US position on a permanent solution led to a collapse of the agriculture negotiations.